Glittering generalities in orbit
Between Sputnik and the first spacewalk the Soviet Union produced the most successful propaganda of its existence: posters, stamps, and films that turned a secret military program into proof that socialism owned the future. The achievements were real. What the posters did with them is the case.
The campaign
On 4 October 1957 the Soviet Union put the first artificial satellite into orbit, and on 12 April 1961 it put the first man there. Between those dates and the first spacewalk, by Alexei Leonov in March 1965, it also sent the first animal, the first probe to the Moon, the first woman, and the first crew of three. Each was announced after it had succeeded, and each was followed by a flood of images.
The posters are the best known. Printed in editions of hundreds of thousands by the state publishing houses, they showed cosmonauts in profile against stars, rockets rising past the Kremlin, and workers and scientists gazing upward, under lines that the whole population could recite: "Glory to the Soviet people, the pioneer of space!", "The road to the stars is open!", "Socialism is our launching pad!" Yuri Gagarin's face, smiling under his helmet, was on posters, stamps, matchboxes, and the covers of magazines across the Eastern bloc and beyond; he toured thirty countries in the two years after his flight. Documentary films, with footage released by the program and narration written by the party, played in every cinema. Children's books, songs, and the new word kosmonavt completed the apparatus.
What the images did not show was as carefully chosen. The program was run by the military and its chief designer, Sergei Korolev, was not named in public until his death in 1966. Launch sites, rockets, and failures were secret. The Nedelin disaster of October 1960, in which a rocket exploded on the pad and killed more than a hundred people, was not acknowledged for three decades. The cosmonauts who were removed from the program were removed from the group photographs as well.
Who ran it and why
The Communist Party's Central Committee set the line, the state's publishing and film agencies produced the material, and the Agitprop department coordinated it, as it had for forty years. The motive was twofold. At home, the space program was the one unambiguous success of the Khrushchev years, a demonstration that the sacrifices of industrialization and war had bought something, and the party claimed it for the system rather than the engineers. Abroad, in the competition with the United States for the loyalty of the newly independent world, the satellite and the smiling cosmonaut were an argument no speech could match: here was the future, and it was Soviet.
The campaign was unusual among Soviet propaganda in having the facts on its side. The firsts were real. The technique lay in what was made of them.
The techniques, in order of weight
Glittering Generalities supplied the language. "Glory", "the future", "the road to the stars", "the dawn of the cosmic era" attached the achievement to abstractions that no one could dispute and that the system claimed as its own.
Transfer did the central work: the prestige of a scientific and engineering feat was carried over to the political system, so that a rocket in orbit became an argument about collective farms. Posters that showed the rocket rising from behind the Kremlin, or a worker's hand launching it, made the transfer explicit.
Cult Of Personality, around Gagarin and, briefly, Valentina Tereshkova. Gagarin's smile, modest manner, and working-class origins made him the perfect face, and the state built him into a figure whose fame outlived the system that made him.
Card Stacking governed what was shown. Successes were announced, failures hidden, the designers anonymous, the military origins of the rockets unmentioned, and the American program's progress reported only when it fell behind.
Flag Waving: every image placed the achievement under the hammer and sickle and made pride in it a form of loyalty.
Bandwagon: posters of crowds gazing upward and of the world's peoples welcoming Gagarin told the viewer that everyone was already celebrating.
The artifacts
Soviet space posters survive in large numbers because they were printed in large numbers, and they are among the most collected political graphics of the twentieth century. The archive's examples are chosen to show the techniques rather than the best designs, though the two often coincide.
The Gagarin posters of 1961 are the heart of the collection. The standard composition sets the cosmonaut's smiling face, helmet on, against a field of stars or a rising rocket, with the slogan beneath; the face is the argument, and it is a good one, since Gagarin photographed as the modest, likeable working man the state wished him to be. A second group pairs the rocket with symbols of the system, the Kremlin, the red star, the hammer and sickle, or a worker's raised hand, and makes the transfer explicit. A third shows the audience: crowds in Red Square, children with model rockets, peoples of the world gathered around the Soviet achievement. The bandwagon is in the picture.
What the posters never show is as telling. There is no launch site, no rocket in recognizable detail, no engineer by name, and no failure. The Nedelin disaster of 1960 and the death of Vladimir Komarov in 1967, the first in-flight fatality, left no trace in the graphic record of their years. Komarov's death was announced, but the posters of 1967 celebrate the fiftieth anniversary of the revolution with a cosmonaut's face, and the face is not his.
What happened
The campaign worked, at home and abroad, for as long as the firsts continued. Soviet prestige in the developing world rose through the early 1960s, and the shock of Sputnik in the United States produced the space race, NASA, and the Apollo program that eventually took the lead. When the Americans landed on the Moon in 1969, Soviet media reported it briefly and the posters stopped. The program's secrecy, which had protected the image, then worked against it: the public had never been told of a lunar program, so its failure could not be admitted, and the official line became that the Soviet Union had never intended to race.
Gagarin died in a training flight in 1968 and was buried in the Kremlin wall; the cult survived him and survived the Soviet Union, and his image remains one of the few from the period that carries no embarrassment in Russia today. The posters are collected and reproduced, and their techniques, the transfer of a technical success to a political system, are visible in every national space program since.
The case repays comparison with its American counterpart. NASA's own publicity, from the Mercury Seven on the cover of Life to the Apollo broadcasts, used many of the same devices: the personable astronaut, the flag on the hardware, the achievement as proof of a system. The differences lie in what the two programs could not hide. American failures were public because the launches were televised, and the openness became a propaganda asset of its own, a claim that the free system could afford to be seen failing. The Soviet program's secrecy was a strength while it won and a liability when it lost, and the posters, which could only ever celebrate, had nothing to say when there was nothing to celebrate.
What it teaches
The space posters are the case for propaganda built on true achievements. Nothing in them was false; the firsts happened. The techniques were in the framing, the attribution, and the silence about everything that did not fit. The lesson for a reader is that a genuine success is the best material a propagandist can have, and that the question to ask of any triumphant message is not whether the thing happened but what it is being made to prove.
- The Soviet firsts were real. What did the posters add to them, and what would the achievement have meant without the framing?
- Korolev was anonymous and the failures were secret. How does what is hidden shape what the visible images mean?
- Gagarin's fame outlived the system that built it. Can a cult of personality be separated from the propaganda that created it?
- Compare a Soviet space poster with a present-day national or corporate space announcement. Which techniques are the same?
Sources
- Andrews, James T., and Asif A. Siddiqi, eds. Into the Cosmos: Space Exploration and Soviet Culture. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 2011. ISBN 978-0822961611
- Gerovitch, Slava. Soviet Space Mythologies: Public Images, Private Memories, and the Making of a Cultural Identity. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 2015. ISBN 978-0822963639
- Siddiqi, Asif A. Challenge to Apollo: The Soviet Union and the Space Race, 1945–1974. Washington: NASA History Division, 2000.
- Jenks, Andrew L. The Cosmonaut Who Couldn't Stop Smiling: The Life and Legend of Yuri Gagarin. DeKalb: Northern Illinois University Press, 2012. ISBN 978-0875804477
- Maurer, Eva, et al., eds. Soviet Space Culture: Cosmic Enthusiasm in Socialist Societies. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011. ISBN 978-0230274358